Focused Shockwave Therapy
What if the problem isn't simply irritated?
You rest it.
It feels a little better.
You start using it again.
And there it is.
That shoulder. That elbow. That knee. That heel.
Again.
When something has been bothering you for months—or sometimes years—it's reasonable to think:
“Maybe I just need to give it more time.”
But eventually another question becomes worth asking.
What if it isn't waiting for more time?
What if it's waiting for a different kind of stimulus?
That's one of the reasons I added focused shockwave therapy to NeuroBalance.
When Healing Seems to Stall
Your body is remarkably good at repairing itself.
Cut your skin and you don't consciously tell it how to heal.
Exercise hard and your body responds by rebuilding and adapting.
Injure a tissue and an entire biological process begins automatically.
But sometimes things don't follow the script.
Tendons can become chronically painful.
Old injuries can remain sensitive.
Areas can become thickened, restricted or poorly tolerant of load.
And eventually you can end up in a frustrating middle ground:
Not acutely injured.
Not really healed.
Just…stuck.
That's where shockwave becomes interesting.
What Is Focused Shockwave Therapy?
Despite the name, this isn't an electrical shock.
Focused shockwave uses high-energy acoustic pressure waves that travel through tissue and can be concentrated at a specific depth.
That matters.
Instead of simply applying something to the surface, focused shockwave allows me to direct mechanical energy toward a particular tissue or region I'm trying to influence.
And the goal isn't simply to make the area feel good while you're lying on the table.
In fact, shockwave doesn't always feel particularly relaxing.
The goal is to create a biological response.
Sometimes the Body Needs a Reason to Change
We usually think about treatment as calming things down.
Decrease the inflammation.
Decrease the pain.
Protect the area.
Rest it.
And early in an injury, those things can make perfect sense.
But chronic problems can be different.
At some point the question may no longer be:
“How do we protect this?”
It may become:
“How do we get this tissue responding again?”
Mechanical stimulation can influence cellular behavior—a process called mechanotransduction.
In simple terms:
Cells respond to physical forces.
Shockwave deliberately introduces a mechanical stimulus into the tissue.
Research suggests that this stimulus can trigger biological processes involved in tissue remodeling, blood-vessel signaling and pain modulation.¹
That's why I think of shockwave very differently from a passive pain-relief modality.
We're not simply trying to cover up a signal.
We're trying to give the body a new input.
And then we allow the body to respond.
What if pain isn't always something we should chase?
This is where things get interesting.
When your elbow hurts, naturally you want the elbow pain gone.
I do too.
But pain is an output.
It tells us something is happening.
It doesn't necessarily tell us everything about why it's happening.
Maybe the tendon itself needs attention.
Maybe the joint isn't moving well.
Maybe you're repeatedly loading the area in a way it can't tolerate.
Maybe the muscles around it aren't doing their share.
Maybe several of those things are happening at once.
So rather than simply asking:
“How do I make this stop hurting?”
I would rather ask:
“Why hasn't this adapted?”
That's a very different question.
And sometimes it leads to a very different treatment strategy.
Where Might Shockwave Be Useful?
Shockwave has been studied extensively for persistent musculoskeletal problems, particularly tendinopathies.
That includes conditions involving areas such as:
Plantar fascia / heel pain
Tennis elbow
Rotator cuff and calcific shoulder problems
Patellar tendon
Gluteal tendons / greater trochanteric pain
Hamstring tendon
Achilles tendon
Research across these conditions isn't identical—and shockwave isn't equally effective for every diagnosis or every person.
But the overall body of research is substantial.
A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing 45 clinical studies reported significant reductions in pain across several common tendinopathies.²
Another 2024 systematic review of 18 randomized controlled trials found improvements in pain and function in several upper-extremity tendon conditions.³
And a systematic review of hip and pelvic tendinopathies found improvement in pain and function across gluteal, hamstring and calcific tendon disorders, although treatment protocols varied among the studies.⁴
That's enough evidence for me to take it seriously.
But the research isn't the only reason I use it.
Why I Added Shockwave to the Muhr Method
I can adjust a joint extremely well.
I can improve movement.
I can change mechanical input into the nervous system.
But sometimes I would finish an adjustment and still be looking at the same stubborn tendon, fascia, scarred region or chronically painful soft tissue.
And I kept coming back to the same thought:
I want another way into this problem.
Not instead of the adjustment.
In addition to it.
Because what if the joint needs to move differently…
and the tissue needs a reason to remodel?
What if we improve the mechanics…
and then create a biological stimulus in the tissue that has been struggling to adapt?
Now we're approaching the problem from two different directions.
That's why focused shockwave earned a place in my office.
Focused vs. Radial Shockwave
Not everything advertised as “shockwave” is the same technology.
Some systems use radial pressure waves, which disperse energy more broadly from the surface.
I use focused shockwave, which allows acoustic energy to be concentrated at a selected depth.
That doesn't automatically mean focused shockwave is better for every condition—research comparing the two has not established a universal winner.⁵
But focused technology gives me something I value clinically:
Precision.
When I've identified the structure I'm trying to influence, I want the ability to target that area deliberately.
What Does It Feel Like?
You'll know we're doing something.
Most people describe shockwave as a repetitive tapping or pulsing sensation.
Some areas are barely uncomfortable.
Others can be surprisingly sensitive—particularly when we find the area that's been bothering you.
That's useful information too.
I can adjust the intensity based on the tissue, the goal and how you're responding.
Treatment is typically brief.
And unlike surgery or an injection, there is no incision and no medication being introduced into the tissue.
You get up and walk out.
Then the interesting part begins.
Your body responds to what we just did.
One Treatment—or Part of Something Bigger?
You absolutely can come to NeuroBalance specifically for shockwave.
Maybe your heel has been bothering you.
Maybe you've been fighting tennis elbow for six months.
Maybe there's an old injury that simply hasn't gotten where you want it to go.
Let's look at it.
If focused shockwave makes sense, I'll tell you.
If I don't think it makes sense, I'll tell you that too.
You don't have to enroll in the Muhr Method to receive shockwave therapy.
But here's where my thinking has changed after nearly 30 years in practice.
If the tissue has been struggling for months…
why?
If the same area keeps being overloaded…
why?
If we're stimulating a tendon to change but never change the mechanics influencing that tendon…
what are we missing?
And if someone's entire system is poorly recovered and constantly under stress…
could that influence how well they respond too?
Those are the questions that led me beyond treating individual body parts.
This Is Where Shockwave Fits Into the Muhr Method
Shockwave has a specific job.
The adjustment changes movement and mechanical/neurological input.
Mobility and neuromuscular work help prepare and retrain movement.
Shockwave gives us another way to influence stubborn tissue.
Photobiomodulation can support cellular processes associated with recovery.
IHHT challenges the body's adaptive capacity.
NuCalm creates deliberate time for recovery.
Measurement helps us determine whether the pattern is actually changing.
No single one of those has to do everything.
That's the point.
What if we stopped asking one treatment to solve the entire problem?
What if instead we identified the different things standing between you and better function…
…and gave each one the right input?
That's the idea behind the Muhr Method.
Maybe You Don't Need More Rest.
Maybe you don't need another six months of hoping it disappears.
Maybe you don't need to accept that your shoulder, elbow, knee or heel is simply “one of those things.”
Maybe it needs to be evaluated differently.
Maybe it needs a different stimulus.
And maybe once we understand why it keeps coming back, we'll discover there's more we can change than you thought.
That's a conversation worth having.
Schedule Focused Shockwave Therapy →
Explore the Complete Muhr Method →
Research
1. Mechanotransduction and extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
Experimental and clinical research has investigated how mechanical shockwave stimulation can influence cellular signaling and biological processes associated with tissue remodeling, vascular signaling and pain modulation.
2. The effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on pain in patients with various tendinopathies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2024. Meta-analysis incorporating 45 clinical studies reported significant pain reductions across several tendinopathies, including plantar fasciitis, lateral epicondylitis, Achilles and rotator cuff disorders.
3. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Frontiers in Medicine, 2024. Review of 18 randomized controlled trials found positive analgesic effects across several upper-extremity tendon disorders and functional improvement in rotator cuff tendinopathy.
4. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Tendinopathies Around the Hip and Pelvis: A Systematic Review.
Systematic review covering gluteal, proximal hamstring and calcific tendinopathies. Most included studies reported improvements in pain and function, although protocols and study quality varied.
5. Efficacy of radial and focused shockwave therapy for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing focused and radial shockwave. Both approaches were generally safe; current evidence does not demonstrate consistent superiority of one technology for pain or functional outcomes.